The book estimates 5% pattern outliers, but then assigns alternative typings to 10% (28/282). (If that would be just a question of requiring more data, how then do we know the other samples are representative?)
My spontaneaus smiles seem to present such conflicting signals, varying depending on context:
They seem more Fe-like when watching funny videos and more Fi-like when I'm having fun on my own.
So, how can we explain that?
A) I'm wired for Ti-Fe, but learned to manipulate myself by manic laughter and playing crazy. Making this an habit lowered my unconscious threshold for snarls.
B) I'm wired for Fi-Te, but surpressed it so much that I don't take anything seriously anymore. This opened me up to play with life, and more adapting smiles.
Last Edit: Apr 5, 2016 6:13:38 GMT -5 by Xander: Clarified that it's the conflicting signals that need explanation
Just my two cents, but I'm not seeing much tension in your cheeks. Your smiles look rather Fe to me, since the area under your nose doesn't seem to be contracting upwards, but rather stretching diagonally.
"Not *how* the world is, is the mystical, but *that* it is." - Wittgenstein
Just my two cents, but I'm not seeing much tension in your cheeks. Your smiles look rather Fe to me, since the area under your nose doesn't seem to be contracting upwards, but rather stretching diagonally.
Thanks, faeruss! I see both Fe and Fi smiles, and while Fe-smiles seem to correspond more to my psychology, prelimanary analysis of my submitted video indicated a greater frequency of Fi-smiles. And I just realized that I can evaluate my general happiness from the tension in my cheeks!
Last Edit: Apr 4, 2016 18:30:19 GMT -5 by Xander: Clarification/formatting
Hi Xander, I can't tell that much about your type from these videos, as you aren't engaged in articulation at all. What I can say is that what ethical function you possess can't be decided just from looking at the quality of the tension around your mouth. The book describes this very well:
The static presence or absence of upward tension alone cannot perfectly differentiate these two functions. If a personβs mouth appears to move with very conscious intention, having no accidental snarls and possessing a yang emotional delivery, then regardless of the quality of their tension, this individual is certainly an Fe type. Likewise, a mouth that is relaxed with plenty of slack in their cheeks, but which demonstrates many accidental snarls and asymmetries when speaking, and which lacks a coordinated impact, most certainly reveals an Fi-Te psychology. Fi tension cannot be the only signal that is examined in order to determine a personβs ethical process. - Cognitive Type, P. 277
But, regarding the psychology of your functions, I think that you have some interesting questions that I'd like to try to help answer. Some of what you describe actually sounds very much like the experience weβd expect for an Fi user.
I think the first thing you mention, having planned to say something, but then saying something else regrettable in the moment, isnβt so much about the particular ethical function one has as it is about being human in general. However, since Fe operates to coordinate a social situation consciously, by contrast what you describe could be the result of a socially uncoordinated Fi reacting spontaneously in the moment. Failing to execute social dynamics in the way one has consciously judged to be correct can be a sign of reactive operation of the ethical function, which indicates Introverted Feeling.
The second thing you mention, having a significant physical reaction to good news, sounds very much like Fiβs deep feeling. Fi is a raw channel between the emotional register and the experience of an individual, unlike Fe which proactively intercedes in emotions and attempts to coordinate their expression to the perceived expectations of the social environment. This doesnβt mean that Fe users canβt have a physical reaction to an emotion, but contrasted to an Fi user, the experience wonβt be as automatic or overwhelming. Fe will likely also be more capable of neutralizing such a reaction, because of its relationship with Ti.
The third thing you mention actually doesnβt sound like itβs especially related to the operation of your ethical function; it sounds more like youβre describing Pe. If you are a Pe-lead, or your psyche relies heavily on your Pe function due to development, then that could explain why your focus is directed in an immediate way. When Pe is leading the psyche, attention is a matter of immediate interest and long-term focus and investment may be difficult. From what you say about having a βtemporary hyperfocus/flowβ, it sounds like Pe has a significant influence in your psyche.
I hope this helps clarify what we're describing when we talk about Fi. I'm curious what else about your experience might lead you to the conclusion that you're an Fe user? Have you been typed on this forum as having Fe/Ti?
CT's book preview helped me realize I was actually a Pe lead. Now, I'm back to confirm whether my Fi is abnormally developed...
UPDATE: And thanks btw for giving explanations for my experiences! I've updated the original post to clarify it's the conflicting signals that needed explanation. So, I moved earlier Fe-examples here:
When meeting someone I often say something else entirely from what I've decided before, and regret it afterwards
On the rare occasions I get really good news, I can feel it in my stomach and my jaw feels unusually tense
The unconscious Fi fails to fuel my worldview; I don't really care about anything until I'm drawn into my next temporary hyperfocus
Last Edit: Apr 5, 2016 6:20:42 GMT -5 by Xander: Updated to keep the context after clarifying the original post
...prelimanary analysis of my submitted video indicated a greater frequency of Fi-smiles.
@forum -aye. just for a little context, Xander sent me a longer private vid earlier that shows a wider range of signals; and my $0.02 was P-lead with Fi/Te.
Regarding your Fi... (and this may be a little hard for other members to see w/o the video but...)
I'd like to give an earnest opinion. I've had one or two close friends with damaged Fi and I can't help but see some parallels emerging between the way you approach situations.
There is some sarcasm and an edginess in your approach to things. In many ways, there's a default unseelie tendency operating, which makes use of Te's dismissiveness.... but which also has some Pe energy at work that's entertained by the whole prospect.
Amusement (curiosity?) at the forefront, inner disbelief and passive-aggressiveness behind the curtains.
Unlike some other Fi users I've known, your Fi is not really "concealed" behind Te's more steely composure. Instead, your Fi is very active and visible, but also very disheartened (imho). So what you get is a visibility of that raw feeling/opinion coating all that you say and express... Your voice tone reflects this as well, with its pained, breathy tone.
I'm not sure what your actual internal experience is, and I don't presume to know. This is just what the signals tell me might be the case, given previous observations and associations. CT isn't meant to be definitive... but informative. If it can help you learn something about yourself, that's most important. It's not always about narrowing things down to one single type. Mountains can be learned about each facet of the equation, even if one facet is all we know - at a given time.
And you appear to have quite a lot going on in terms of development, which I'd love to learn more about if you ever feel inclined to share.
And you appear to have quite a lot going on in terms of development, which I'd love to learn more about if you ever feel inclined to share.
It seems that I need to individuate my judgement more, and I'd love to understand Fi-Te users better as I find them generally hard to relate to. Where do I start?
Last Edit: Apr 5, 2016 6:47:13 GMT -5 by Xander: Formatting
Xander, are you (by any chance) willing to upload a more thorough video in the forum? I am detecting PeTi from the short footages you have made available so far in the forum, but you've made public here too short footage.
@morsecode Just in case you missed it, there is a 14-minute-long video in this thread. (I realise perhaps you meant an even longer video, but I wasn't sure )
Xander , thanks for the last upload. It clarified things a lot.Β
Deciding on someone's J functions is not about overvaluing isolated signals. It is explained in the book that precise identification of Fi can be challenging once so many factors can affect the appearance of Fi tension. Nevertheless, even your snarls taken in isolation in this last video clearly show Fi. I honestly don't see any anomalies in your snarl or smile - they don't send mixed signals. Fi users can Β have wide smiles, and your smile is indeed wide - while the muscles around it contract fully in typical Fi fashion. Even though the buldging around the nose is normally more visible in people who have Fi-Te as primary oscillation (Fi-leads and Te-leads), it is not hard to find Fi-supports who have that - however, it is by no means something to be necessarily expected from an Fi-support - while some Fi-supports have very exaggerated snarls, some don't (Gotye and Chris Martin come to mind now). Besides, the muscles in your face don't move as a collaborative unit as one would expect from an Fe user. Instead, the muscles of of face contract at different paces, markedly uncoordinated. A succession of Fi contempt is visible in your mouth area at around 1:05, when you are asked 'what's the biggest turn off in a man or a woman'.
Te: together with the total absence of Ti momentum-halting, stop-start gesticulation, Fe on-beat voice tone, gesticulation and pushes, you display typical Te fast (I mean, fast) tempo and snippy articulation. Your voice mingles Te and Fi in a peculiar/interesting way: an Fi airy element infused in sorrowful emotionality is mixed with Te avalanching snippy dismissive articulation.
Concerning you perception functions, I would expect a higher level of toggling from a high Ne user. When you look at your interlocutor, your eyes look very sharp and montionless, not relaxed/'naive'. Plus, your eyebrows do some movements that I haven't seen any NeFi do so far, which reminds me of the SeFi manic look (print screens below). I'm going to post two print screens here; I must learn quickly how to make deletion links, so you can delete it at any moment, if you decide so ^^ *morsecode waves handz for deletion link help! o/* :Β
I wish I had time to go on. I hope this was enlightening or, at least, useful.Β
Your second video is great, Xander ! You seem to be coming very much from your natural self, which is ideal for an accurate CT analysis.
I agree with Erifrail and morsecode that you're an Fi user. Even though your smiles sometimes spread out horizontally, as morsecode mentioned and as it says in the part of the book I quoted before, this isn't necessarily an indication of the presence of Fe. From what I can see, it seems that your smiles pull upwards more often and more intensely than they spread to the sides.
I've done a breakdown of some of the most significant signals I observed in your most recent video that lead me to the conclusion that you're an Fi/Te user:
When you speak, your upper lip is consistently lifted toward your nose in an Fi snarl. (Examples of Fi snarling: @ 0:32, 0:36, 1:00, 1:08-1:12, 1:30, 1:33, 1:39, etc.) The rest of the movements of your mouth are made either in addition to this upward tension, or if the tension changes direction (such as in a frown), your mouth returns to its upward lift afterward. Your energy never neutralizes, as would indicate Ti. Your articulation is also quick and relatively monotone/consistent without any emotional pushes, which is all very characteristic of Te.
Your laugh is very sudden, spontaneous and has a giddy quality to it quite indicative of Fi. Examples of this laugh can be found at @ 0:14, 0:43, 3:02, 4:13, 5:04 and 5:18 in your video.
You also appear emotionally affected in the characteristic bashful way seen in high Fi users. A good example of this is when you're asked the question about what the biggest turn off is. You immediately back up from the interviewer, you recede into yourself, and you smile a bashful smile which causes a taught tension in both your cheeks and lower lip, then let out a subtle spontaneous laugh that moves your body forward with its energy. The tension in your cheeks remains the entire time you're answering the question, causing quite a few accidental, asymmetrical expressions that resemble embarrassment or disgust (as seen below).
While I think your judgement functions are pretty obvious, and that you are a clear Pe-lead, which perception oscillation you have is a bit more difficult to decipher. However, from what I can tell it seems you have Ne leading your psyche with an unusually heavy influence of Si.
Your eyes do toggle from time to time in the scattered movement characteristic of Ne, but most of the time no toggling is visible. Your brows and upper eyelids also press down over your eyes in the way seen in high Si users. I think it's likely that Si is adding some viscosity to your Ne; reducing the eye movement and spontaneous associations usually present in Ne-leads. What's curious if this is true, though, is that you don't do much Si scowling. If you are indeed Ne/Si, then you have a very unique development.
Signals indicating Pe-lead:
- Consistent body swaying - Quick, loose movements - Head & body follow direction of eyes
Signals indicating Ne/Si:
- 'Scattered' movement and thought processes - Eyebrows press down over eyes & are turned up toward center - Eyelids slope down over eyes characteristic of Si - Eye toggling: 0:03, 0:54, 0:36, 1:51, 2:00, 2:40, etc.
My best estimate on your type would be NeFi, however I think there is room left to speculate.
@morsecode , well explained and good catch of that look at my interlocutor (I'm practicing to look people in the eyes)
Alerith , also well explained and I'm indeed 'in the grip' of Si from a recent career switch (or maybe I simply like Si more)
For the curious, compare with Erifrail's earlier "Analysis outcome": "I believe you are an NeFi with quite a strong sensitivity to your own Fi. Unlike many other Fi users (Fi leads included), there is an open, honest channel between you and your Fi, which causes your heavy levels of Fi snarling and the quality of your voice. Your energy is constantly transitioning, drifting and perking up (Ne), but you also show a fair deal of inner resonance with the values and ethics of your Fi."
Conclusion: I'm wired for Fi-Te but surpressed my judgement, widening my smiles (~explanation B)
Last Edit: Apr 10, 2016 14:20:09 GMT -5 by Xander: Added the conclusion