Post by BrightDark on Mar 13, 2017 1:53:20 GMT -5
Ok. Here is my plea to this forum:
There is a common problem I've run into when dealing with new typological theories such as this one: there isn't the type database large enough to support the theory's validity. I've seen people on this forum talk plentifully about all the various "beautiful SeFi and FiSe women, and Fi cues," but whenever it comes to other ExFx women, like FeSi for instance, all I see are threads of repeating gifs of Emma Watson over and over again. It's not good enough. Nowhere near good enough for adopting a theory as fact. In the typological theories I've dealt in for the past 10 years, we've had hundreds of examples of celebrities for each quadra, validating their manifestation in reality on a large relational scope.
In this thread, I'm challenging you to risk accuracy for now and just go for a quantity of different hunches and see how many popular people we can guess on, and then we'll work them out accurately later. I want to see how you differentiate someone into a quadra upon first glance. I'm especially looking for women to compare all these attractive Gammas to you keep typing. FeSi, FeNi, and NeFi, or any type. Your intuitive knowledge could be a lot to advance this theory's application, so go for some bold hunches and let's build a list of possibilities. Because do we really want to look at Emma Watson's expressions over and over? I don't. I'm not interested in Rachel McAdams. How about a bunch of new faces? Feel free, just post a famous actress, model or singer, and take a wild guess! We won't hold you to it, put a question mark after it.
You all together might be knowledgeable enough to pull this thread off and really help CT grow with a big list later. Let's try, and then later we can really make sure they're correct. But for now, we just want to see if this theory will easily apply to lots of people and quadras. I especially want to see guesses for attractive ExFxs to compare to the Gamma SFs. Thanks for trying to help
There is a common problem I've run into when dealing with new typological theories such as this one: there isn't the type database large enough to support the theory's validity. I've seen people on this forum talk plentifully about all the various "beautiful SeFi and FiSe women, and Fi cues," but whenever it comes to other ExFx women, like FeSi for instance, all I see are threads of repeating gifs of Emma Watson over and over again. It's not good enough. Nowhere near good enough for adopting a theory as fact. In the typological theories I've dealt in for the past 10 years, we've had hundreds of examples of celebrities for each quadra, validating their manifestation in reality on a large relational scope.
In this thread, I'm challenging you to risk accuracy for now and just go for a quantity of different hunches and see how many popular people we can guess on, and then we'll work them out accurately later. I want to see how you differentiate someone into a quadra upon first glance. I'm especially looking for women to compare all these attractive Gammas to you keep typing. FeSi, FeNi, and NeFi, or any type. Your intuitive knowledge could be a lot to advance this theory's application, so go for some bold hunches and let's build a list of possibilities. Because do we really want to look at Emma Watson's expressions over and over? I don't. I'm not interested in Rachel McAdams. How about a bunch of new faces? Feel free, just post a famous actress, model or singer, and take a wild guess! We won't hold you to it, put a question mark after it.
You all together might be knowledgeable enough to pull this thread off and really help CT grow with a big list later. Let's try, and then later we can really make sure they're correct. But for now, we just want to see if this theory will easily apply to lots of people and quadras. I especially want to see guesses for attractive ExFxs to compare to the Gamma SFs. Thanks for trying to help