Fe, Te, and oratory strengths
Jan 18, 2018 13:59:46 GMT -5 by mikesilb
teatime, Aqua, and 2 more like this
Post by mikesilb on Jan 18, 2018 13:59:46 GMT -5
As I delve further into the distinctions between the two Je functions, it is clear that they represent two distinct oratory styles. In Fe, it is about a measured capacity to be on point in a way that maximizes the impact/affect towards the recipients. In Te, it is about telling the core facts in a way that focuses on being direct and focused on the facts. (And I admit that Fe can do what I just wrote about Te at times and vice versa, so this delineation only goes so far).
To me, it is clear that both functions when applied properly can make for a very effective and impactful oratory style. In this thread, it would be cool to describe the best of how both Fe and Te articulate in real time with solid examples from both functions, using YouTube examples (using speeches, interviews, etc.). If we can delineate those differences clearly, yet apply mastery in how they both speak their perspectives, I think that this could be a highly informative thread (especially for people learning the general distinctions between the two).
Sounds like a good idea?
To me, it is clear that both functions when applied properly can make for a very effective and impactful oratory style. In this thread, it would be cool to describe the best of how both Fe and Te articulate in real time with solid examples from both functions, using YouTube examples (using speeches, interviews, etc.). If we can delineate those differences clearly, yet apply mastery in how they both speak their perspectives, I think that this could be a highly informative thread (especially for people learning the general distinctions between the two).
Sounds like a good idea?
). Some honest Fi-like presentations seem to me to be very compelling because of the vulnerability of the person. They seem only concerned with authentically expressing emotional truth and not so much to "communicate" like Je.