Post by Harry Pitts on Mar 18, 2018 9:43:42 GMT -5
In my type analysis I was told that my development is III- and my usage of Fi is Seelie? What do these things mean exactly ? Is there a link that gives the different development types?
Fi can express as either Seelie or Unseelie, loosely associate to mainly positive and mainly negative emotional expression. There are threads around here somewhere that address it better, should be easy to search up.
The II-I sort of notation says whether each of your first, second, third, and fourth functions come up in common conscious use.
Fi can express as either Seelie or Unseelie, loosely associate to mainly positive and mainly negative emotional expression. There are threads around here somewhere that address it better, should be easy to search up.
The II-I sort of notation says whether each of your first, second, third, and fourth functions come up in common conscious use.
I did some digging into the website and I found stuff about seelie vs. nonseelie Fi and some information in the Cognitive Typology book however, I searched and searched and still couldn't find anything about II-I notation.
So are you saying that if I have III- notation I would be conscious of the usage of my 1st, 2nd, and 3rd functions and not conscious of my 4th function?
So are you saying that if I have III- notation I would be conscious of the usage of my 1st, 2nd, and 3rd functions and not conscious of my 4th function?
Post by Harry Pitts on Mar 25, 2018 15:39:05 GMT -5
How does someone make what's unconscious more conscious? Is that even possible?
Also could someone have such a poor development that they are only consciously aware of the 1st function? How about someone who isn't even consciously aware of their first function. It dominates their psyche, they use it most frequenly but they aren't consciously aware of it?
How does someone make what's unconscious more conscious? Is that even possible?
Also could someone have such a poor development that they are only consciously aware of the 1st function? How about someone who isn't even consciously aware of their first function. It dominates their psyche, they use it most frequenly but they aren't consciously aware of it?
Making the unconscious conscious is a difficult personal development thing. Jung wrote a lot of stuff about it, if you feel like digging that up.
It's not too uncommon to have only one function conscious.
I don't think we've observed an unconscious first function. May very well not exist.
