Ejarendee wat r u doin... Ej, shtap.

It seems that he completely snubbed me in his youtube video. Baad ej, baad.

cjorr He is proven to be a SeTi in this forum, read at this thread , PeJi can be quite confusing because they act in a very similar manner

NingenExp No, i'm a banana. You can be any other fruit in the world but not the banana. Banana is miiiiiine

Oh no sir! I will fight for the banana title in the forum. You can be the boring apple. 

I think that the idea of contrasting functions working together is an idea that would be difficult to accept for a lot in the community. No Ne without Si, no Ni without Se, no Ti without Fe, no Fi without Te and vice versa. Also the idea of functions being visually readable, moreover if there's some room for ambiguity due to lack of practice, taking the identification of visual signals so technically seriously or lightly (assigning cues with low reliability to functions, watching a contradiction in visual signals, discrediting the whole system without deepening in its understanding by watching the Larin series and comparing, making a collection of personal typifications and reading the articles with visual accompaniments). I also think that there's a general misunderstanding of the functions from a technical standpoint (e.g. Si is not necessarily traditionalism, Si is storage of unconnected concrete data). There's also those who, understanding all of this, would discredit it anyway because they would think of it as a completely apart system that's disregarding entirely a behavioral approach and that's partly how CT comes across, saying crazy things like Einstein and Britney Spears are the same type. It's been said over and over again or at least that's how I see it. The direction of CT is to firstly know empirically how the brain works, then to sustain it by the use of EEGs and lastly to suggest personality types (behavioral packages) that are in alignment with the theory respecting others' subjectivity (personal bios).

That's the aim, I think. To find that accordance between the brain mechanism (EEGs) and behavior. I was hesitating if it would be better if I stated that saying that those two characters were of the same cognitive configuration was "crazy" instead of crazy.

yeah I'm now definitely seeing the Se/Ni his occasional introverted perceiving looks somewhat zoned out rather than the presence Si would have also without the frown more commonly displayed with Si. it's definitely a subtle art telling the difference between the for lack of a better word more present looks of sensing functions against the less present looks of intuition. I'm still having some difficulty with his Fe though i don't see any Ti in his gesticulations they seem pretty solid and not very meticulous and the few expressions that i did see on him weren't very symmetrical one corner or another of his mouth perks up more than the other. take a look at 6:30 to see a hugely asymmetrical scowl and that same left corner scowl keeps happening at least until 7:30 and i also see Te eyebrow raises through out the whole video.

Another video by about extroverts vs introverts



He basically says the same thing as CT, that's refreshing ^^