Oh something that generally crosses my mind when I see these kind of MBTI descriptions based on letters is that the letter 'S' is a lot like Te. Really, if you have Te, you can't just ignore facts unless you're ignorant of them. Kinda funny how both of these theories are based on the same theory, yet so... different, kinda. I guess it's just that no one has came here and started interpreting the data completely incorrectly, then spreading their knowledge around, lol.
I see these kind of MBTI descriptions based on letters is that the letter 'S' is a lot like Te. Really, if you have Te, you can't just ignore facts unless you're ignorant of them.
This is funny actually, because every normal human starts with facts (true or not) when is judging something. What kind of intuition can you make if you don't have any element to do it? If the mbti types actually exists i think the most similar people would be persons with mental diseases or perception disorders. Another thing, i think mbti (and socionics and the others) takes the thing of the jung's archetypes too seriously (and literaly).
^^ I have shared my opinion on the flatness myers-briggs so many times on the forum that I won't repeat myself. But, well, I watched the first video... the whole video sounds like 'myers-briggs for toddlers'.
really cringeworthy.
Last Edit: Jun 27, 2013 16:39:36 GMT -5 by Deleted
That said.. those seem to be a pretty concise synopsis of the reality of MBTI (including the use of pop-culture pony icons as examples of extroverts and introverts)