Post by seekerselfdiscovery on Aug 14, 2013 0:31:49 GMT -5
Just wondering when we can expect Cognitive Types to wrap up the series for good. I mean when do you plan to put up the rest of your findings. I personally think the sooner the better. I think we should get the ball rolling. Everyone should just put all their cards on the table and let the chips fall where they may. We should be working for the greater good of type. I think we should avoid any trickery. If you have something that could benefit others just say it strait up. Are you planning on finishing the series soon? Are you working on it now as we speak? Do you already have the answerers? Are you making it up on the fly? Is you're theory complete? When do you plan to reveal your whole theory? Do you ever plan to? I see a lot of blanks. Do you plan to fill them in?
Considering the amount of time previous practitioners took before publishing a consolidated report/book/theory (5 years/ 10 years+), I'd say we're doing quite well... (2 year in development so far). I've been gathering my notes on the topic, both from personal scraps unshared elsewhere as well as articles shared here, and have some 51,000 words of material to sort through.
The absence of understanding (of the general populate) won't be going anywhere soon. It has remained unsolved for 90 years and it likely would another ten or more, but I am working on it right now, yes. Still I tend to be methodical and perfectionistic... I'm a critical mind which can catch mistakes in other theoretical constructs, and can identify the sort of explanations other critical minds would require and feel an obligation to articulate what I see to the best of my capacity and clarity so it may be considered for what it actually is.
Do you already have the answerers? Are you making it up on the fly? Is you're theory complete?
It is complete within the parameters of what the first book will be presenting - an empirical means to measure consciousness / a new platform in which to define and study the psyche. The studies that follow will reveal more, but making the initial break is imperative. And if the material was simply in the form of unorganized dialogue and "share-as-we-go" conversation, it would not reach a wider audience as fast as it could via condensing it all coherently in one package.
It would remain understood to different degrees by different people, as people enter and leave the dialogues being had, and a lot of the uncertainties would remain. Messy. That's why I'd prefer to take an approach where presenting the "whole" theory at once will be the start - and from that, dialogue/debate/critique and peer reviewing can follow -- at least then it is known that what is being talked about is the same hypothesis.
Post by seekerselfdiscovery on Aug 14, 2013 2:59:24 GMT -5
So I from what I gather it's a long work in progress. You don't expect to finish for at least a century. You are fairly confident in some of your findings that you will be putting in a book. It will still be up for editing, and input from others though. When do you plan to get to the stage where you put that information out there, so other's can give their input?
Post by seekerselfdiscovery on Aug 14, 2013 23:35:05 GMT -5
Erifrail may we be expecting all the information soon? I mean all as in within the parameters you were speaking of Will the information from the book be continued on the channel? It seems like it came to a halt. Any reason in particular? Will it be continued? If so, when?