Post by robinhood on Sept 28, 2013 15:16:17 GMT -5
Auburn, Alerith
There's been quite a few threads regarding how functions relate to learning style on the forum, and I myself have given the topic a great deal of thought. Based on what I've read, it does seem that different types/functions learn significantly differently, and awareness of this could be helpful when it comes to learning VR.
I know the authors probably are quite busy these days, writing the book on CT/living their own lives.. I think that one thing that would perhaps be really helpful to new-comers/veterans of the forum, would be some general information that you perhaps have found on how the functions relate to learning. Its relevant to most on the forum, since learning VR seems for me to be main usage of the forum/website today. Some information on this would perhaps also put the curious analyzer in my head to rest, so that I can focus more on learning VR, and put less attention on understanding how the functions relate to learning..
haha, it would make him happy.
I'm especially curious on the relevance of the two perception sets of functions.. What could an Ne/Si-user be more aware of, to improve the efficiency of learning? What are some potential problem areas for Ni/Se-user, and how could they balance this? Does Ne/Si-users have more of an "bit-by-bit"-approach when it comes to identifying type, while Ni/Se a more wholistic/"flash-of-insight"? Several high-Ni users in the forums mentions doing VR based on the general outline of what they see, while struggling with the details.
I would greatly appreciate some general notes on this!
There's been quite a few threads regarding how functions relate to learning style on the forum, and I myself have given the topic a great deal of thought. Based on what I've read, it does seem that different types/functions learn significantly differently, and awareness of this could be helpful when it comes to learning VR.
I know the authors probably are quite busy these days, writing the book on CT/living their own lives.. I think that one thing that would perhaps be really helpful to new-comers/veterans of the forum, would be some general information that you perhaps have found on how the functions relate to learning. Its relevant to most on the forum, since learning VR seems for me to be main usage of the forum/website today. Some information on this would perhaps also put the curious analyzer in my head to rest, so that I can focus more on learning VR, and put less attention on understanding how the functions relate to learning..
haha, it would make him happy.I'm especially curious on the relevance of the two perception sets of functions.. What could an Ne/Si-user be more aware of, to improve the efficiency of learning? What are some potential problem areas for Ni/Se-user, and how could they balance this? Does Ne/Si-users have more of an "bit-by-bit"-approach when it comes to identifying type, while Ni/Se a more wholistic/"flash-of-insight"? Several high-Ni users in the forums mentions doing VR based on the general outline of what they see, while struggling with the details.
I would greatly appreciate some general notes on this!
express it!