Hello, Alessio here from Rome. In the last year i've been developing a deep interest in Jung-MBTI-Socionics approaches (i am more persuaded by socionics system) and eventually got thrilled by the idea of being capable of visually identifing people.
i am what you like to call a NiFe on this site, one of those fake Ti theorists, you know i became much more capable in using Fe in the last 8 years though.
The espression i used has been lamely stolen from the NiFe page in this very site. The page is filled with fake latin nonsense text, but the structure is done, and you can see there that the author pointed to a NiFe set of typical behaviours as "Ti theorist".
So i used the same name in order to bait some answer, because well, i am a mostly the Ti Theorist type... yeah, but again, what do i mean with this?
The natural use of ti is tied to an extroverted perception (so, let's say ne) in the sense, i believe, that ne tinkers with reality showing the various possibilities that a single item offers, and ti prunes all the oddities with its abstract coherence filter, so producing a theory.
Now, what i do instead is throwing a Fe-Ti fluid cycle on a ni perception. I do a sort of constant self communication when i think, self explaining myself my insights, often with rhetoric sensibility and careful picking of terms; so i need to leverage on my communicative Fe part even when i am alone, and, you see, i pair it seaminglessly with the precision that ti likes so much. Additionally, i use this "counterweighted" feeling no matter which topic i address; for example, i like to study some math in my spare time, and i am always questioning me about how the new thing is coherent with every other information i acquired (and this is very Ti related) end eventually, what's the general meaning of the whole thing.
The same way, i wouldn't be able to explain you if i am interested in psychologic issues to be happier and a better person or just to understand. Often i look for coherence as a main goal. Even on purely ethical grounds, i need to act according to my values, that are really systematically interwined in a phylosophical style.
And another, bigger example, i believe that the creation in the bible points a lot toward my idea of what energy and matter physically are, and so i find that there are some clues of Einstein's relativity into it, even though the whole thing is actually about spirituality
On the other side, i am really lacking a lot on Se grounds, so the total effect of this looks as though my Ni is super dominant and cannibalizing all the secondary cycle to feed itself and oscillate minimally to Se. I can notice details and act in an amazingly forceful way, but this is rare; i mostly spend my time alone reviewing meanings, coherence and overplanning my social interactions.
i hope i was able to provide a coherent answer which is communicationally effective