Post by Bazz on Apr 30, 2014 16:17:36 GMT -5
Aw come on you are suppose to teach me! What if i had said she is Re-Mi? 
anyway, i believe she is Ni-Se. I read the part of the site which relates to the brain activity and i found it SUPERENLIGHTENING. I desumed that the true moment when you really have to check eyes is when the person thinks hard. A ne-si WILL either blink or scan, less likely he will do a combination, depending on what's the balance in his cycle. A Ni-Se person, i believe, invariantly has to show some Ni.
This is how i picture it in my mind. Ne works like a shredder, destroys the reality to find novel uses for it, and leaves minced sensations on its trail. Si gathers these chopped infos; i believe that when this is happening there is the blinking phase, which means that Si is slowing Ne to get time to gather and stock the data. These gathered infos become an additional resource where Ne can scan. So when thinking hard a Ne-Si either recalls a lot (frown Si maybe with blinking) or scans his Si with Ne (moving eyes horizontally).
Se-Ni is much less collaborative and more specialized and phased. They are like the leopard that kills the prey, then climbs the tree to eat it in peace. Se is all devoted to photographical gathering, Ni is pure blindness and extrapolation. So it is normal that when it comes to combine data and not gathering, even the wildest Se shows Ni. It is like a chess game, Se and Ni never move at the same time. The eyes are like this, when the person gathers they are open and "suck" reality in the head; when he thinks it is like he is projecting the supposed map onto reality to figure it out; Se can only make itself helpful by holding mental imagery tightly and vividly in these moments, but it doesn't "move". You know, like when you decide to display the city map of the streets on Google earth. This is why Se locks and Ni pierces.
i believe that the moment of observation counts more than priority rules: make a person think hard, and there is the perception.
judgments are much harder to me. The only anchor i found is the snarling, but when it is not there, i am lost. I didn't catch any Fi move in her, but is this enough to call Fe-Ti?
and the tips to determine the dominant function, those are the hardest to me. Help
anyway, i believe she is Ni-Se. I read the part of the site which relates to the brain activity and i found it SUPERENLIGHTENING. I desumed that the true moment when you really have to check eyes is when the person thinks hard. A ne-si WILL either blink or scan, less likely he will do a combination, depending on what's the balance in his cycle. A Ni-Se person, i believe, invariantly has to show some Ni.This is how i picture it in my mind. Ne works like a shredder, destroys the reality to find novel uses for it, and leaves minced sensations on its trail. Si gathers these chopped infos; i believe that when this is happening there is the blinking phase, which means that Si is slowing Ne to get time to gather and stock the data. These gathered infos become an additional resource where Ne can scan. So when thinking hard a Ne-Si either recalls a lot (frown Si maybe with blinking) or scans his Si with Ne (moving eyes horizontally).
Se-Ni is much less collaborative and more specialized and phased. They are like the leopard that kills the prey, then climbs the tree to eat it in peace. Se is all devoted to photographical gathering, Ni is pure blindness and extrapolation. So it is normal that when it comes to combine data and not gathering, even the wildest Se shows Ni. It is like a chess game, Se and Ni never move at the same time. The eyes are like this, when the person gathers they are open and "suck" reality in the head; when he thinks it is like he is projecting the supposed map onto reality to figure it out; Se can only make itself helpful by holding mental imagery tightly and vividly in these moments, but it doesn't "move". You know, like when you decide to display the city map of the streets on Google earth. This is why Se locks and Ni pierces.
i believe that the moment of observation counts more than priority rules: make a person think hard, and there is the perception.
judgments are much harder to me. The only anchor i found is the snarling, but when it is not there, i am lost. I didn't catch any Fi move in her, but is this enough to call Fe-Ti?
and the tips to determine the dominant function, those are the hardest to me. Help
that's what I noticed anyway. You're Pe-lead definitely, I will just say PeTi with NeTi being more likely. 
