Post by windows on Jul 14, 2014 11:31:14 GMT -5
i've red the thread titled physics & FiNe and thought it to be rather intriguing. Now CT isn't presumptuous about the correlation between type with behavior, lifestyle choices and vocational preferences. However its threads like these where i am convinced that still it isn't negligible. But i can't imagine that the specifics of that relationship can be postulated beyond the point of subjective reasoning. Yet still i find the activity itself to be enthralling because its a good stimulus for my imagination. I would reckon that many of us have treated the functions and information here as if they were our own sims module so to speak. In my opinion i think that for most of us it is our only real motivation. There is simply to much nuance to look for and being objectively agreeable is already difficult enough. So I would treat these forums more as in metaphor a circle of literary enthusiasts with their own unique language.
Anyways i've rambled to much here is the point of this thread. I went to the nobel prize award site and looked for winners in the past 15 years. While there i noticed some of the laureates had pronounced stares and weren't on the list from that other thread. So I selected the ones whom received at minimum half the prize reward and complied a list.
I thought up some interesting questions in conjunction and would like a impression of what the answers would be. First i want to know if the enumerations of the delta types meant anything. Which if it does may suggest that hierarchy has un-negligible influence. Of course i'm not asking anyone to type deltas at least not intentionally. I just want to look at a different case if the gammas predominately had one breadwinner. For example 70%-90% being TeNi. And I would be most surprised if alot of the people from my list where deltas. But that would just give me a different impression.
Choose a person(s) and type him
François Englert
Peter W. Higgs
Serge Haroche
David J. Wineland
Andre Geim
Konstantin Novoselov
Yoichiro Nambu
Albert Fert
Jack S. Kilby
Peter Grünberg
Anyways i've rambled to much here is the point of this thread. I went to the nobel prize award site and looked for winners in the past 15 years. While there i noticed some of the laureates had pronounced stares and weren't on the list from that other thread. So I selected the ones whom received at minimum half the prize reward and complied a list.
I thought up some interesting questions in conjunction and would like a impression of what the answers would be. First i want to know if the enumerations of the delta types meant anything. Which if it does may suggest that hierarchy has un-negligible influence. Of course i'm not asking anyone to type deltas at least not intentionally. I just want to look at a different case if the gammas predominately had one breadwinner. For example 70%-90% being TeNi. And I would be most surprised if alot of the people from my list where deltas. But that would just give me a different impression.
Choose a person(s) and type him
François Englert
Peter W. Higgs
Serge Haroche
David J. Wineland
Andre Geim
Konstantin Novoselov
Yoichiro Nambu
Albert Fert
Jack S. Kilby
Peter Grünberg