Post by Heron on Jun 6, 2013 5:53:02 GMT -5
In this thread I want to make a discussion about the validity of "Ne naive eyes" or "Ne eyes in sockets" signal, i'm not talking about the movements of the eyes but the quality of the eyes itself, i think this can make some problems in the visual reading.
Watching photos of high Ne and Se users i see how some Se users doesn't have the characteristic "piercing eyes", they seems to remain inside the eyelids in a similar way of the Ne eyes.
I made some images to make some confrontations between high Se and high Ne users, joining them according to their J functions:
i start with Ti/Fe users:
Jim Carrey (NeTi)
Neutral state Smile Scowl
Brendan Fraser (TiSe)
The eyes are quite similar in the anatomical composition, in the neutral state and in the smile the eyes presents the same behavior, in my opinion the biggest difference is in the scowl, the one from Jim Carrey is inquiring, the one from fraser is exploring.
Now, some Fi/Te users:
Daniel Radcliffe (SeFi)
Robin Williams (NeFi)
again, in the neutral state and in the smile the differences are minimal, the biggest one is in the scowl, Radcliffe presents the "pierce" quality and Williams presents the "concentrated" stare.
final consideration: in my opinion the eyes muscles are a little example of everyone functions, for example, my eyes in a relaxed state can seem pretty piercy like a Se user, but when i smile they became more affable and soft, the only way to see the functions is to watch videos and se the eyes in motion, or alternatively: what'cha the scowl!
Watching photos of high Ne and Se users i see how some Se users doesn't have the characteristic "piercing eyes", they seems to remain inside the eyelids in a similar way of the Ne eyes.
I made some images to make some confrontations between high Se and high Ne users, joining them according to their J functions:
i start with Ti/Fe users:
Jim Carrey (NeTi)
Neutral state Smile Scowl
Brendan Fraser (TiSe)
The eyes are quite similar in the anatomical composition, in the neutral state and in the smile the eyes presents the same behavior, in my opinion the biggest difference is in the scowl, the one from Jim Carrey is inquiring, the one from fraser is exploring.
Now, some Fi/Te users:
Daniel Radcliffe (SeFi)
Robin Williams (NeFi)
again, in the neutral state and in the smile the differences are minimal, the biggest one is in the scowl, Radcliffe presents the "pierce" quality and Williams presents the "concentrated" stare.
final consideration: in my opinion the eyes muscles are a little example of everyone functions, for example, my eyes in a relaxed state can seem pretty piercy like a Se user, but when i smile they became more affable and soft, the only way to see the functions is to watch videos and se the eyes in motion, or alternatively: what'cha the scowl!
, my point isn't the completely devaluation of the anatomical presentation of the Ne eyes, i'm simply pointing out that cannot be an important meter to take in consideration, the variables are too often present in the people, and base the VR on that signal in particular the risk is to mislead everything, i consider that more like an icing on the cake.
