TeSi: The Definitive Vultology
Apr 17, 2018 15:40:43 GMT -5 by Auburn
Alerith, sitbone, and 7 more like this
Post by Auburn on Apr 17, 2018 15:40:43 GMT -5
Note: If you experience loading problems, it seems videos load better in Chrome.
Warning - Another long post; they're gonna be dense with information from here on out.
Pre: This article is written mainly for the vultology team and as preparation for the upcoming practitioner program, so it's exhaustive and methodical. But I've decided to open this up to the forum since I know there are some out there that wish to learn vultology more keenly as well. Do note, however, that it may take a while to get through this post (maybe read it in parts? ) as it essentially condenses a whole (upcoming) lecture into one thread.
Up until now the 16 vultologies of the types have still contained far too much variability within them that hasn't been organized or explained. A percentage of mistypings would slip by especially with borderline cases (like NeFi-Te and TeSi-Ne) and we've had no tool or standard to help differentiate these cases. But now we're moving into a very granular quantification of types based on the level of consciousness of each function -- as it's indeed proven possible to see this vultologically. It's actually fascinating how well and easy it comes together, and how apparent it is once you see it. This represents the beginning of a new standard for CT, and a methodology that will be used going forward.
Note: These annotations we've come up with (l---, ll--, lll-, llll, l--l, l-l-, l-ll, ll-l) have come to mean far more than what I anticipated. This post will thus double as an introduction to the TeSi vultology but also as a more thorough explanation as to what these annotations mean not just for TeSi but for all the types.
I realized watching vids has been a drag up til now, but do watch the videos here as they've been completely cleaned up for this occasion. Each is an unbroken 2-3 minutes of footage of only the subject (more details on this later). I also have side-by-sides at the end of some posts so you can see more clearly what the signature looks like. Each development level has a different vultology and you can check any new sample against this list of TeSi's to see what their development is.
Final Note: These visuals are matched together not only by eight development levels but also by attitude of the F function (seelie/unseelie), the presence or absence of flat affect, and by gender. When all these variables align in the same people (creating a 1 in 1024 match), the two individuals are essentially/automatically twin shades (which helps if they're also the same age/ethnicity). This new level of resolution will be the standard, which has a maximum number of 4096 when Ego/Subtype is factored in. However, ego is something that can't be measured vultologically but instead by examining psychology and what people say. To some extent this can be intuited from what they say in these short clips but it's better addressed through prolonged exposure and study of the person. (more info on this granular system can be found here) This thread will also be updated in the future as more gaps are filled in for all the possible developmental variants of the TeSi.
[/font][/b][/div]
Warning - Another long post; they're gonna be dense with information from here on out.
Pre: This article is written mainly for the vultology team and as preparation for the upcoming practitioner program, so it's exhaustive and methodical. But I've decided to open this up to the forum since I know there are some out there that wish to learn vultology more keenly as well. Do note, however, that it may take a while to get through this post (maybe read it in parts? ) as it essentially condenses a whole (upcoming) lecture into one thread.
/////
Up until now the 16 vultologies of the types have still contained far too much variability within them that hasn't been organized or explained. A percentage of mistypings would slip by especially with borderline cases (like NeFi-Te and TeSi-Ne) and we've had no tool or standard to help differentiate these cases. But now we're moving into a very granular quantification of types based on the level of consciousness of each function -- as it's indeed proven possible to see this vultologically. It's actually fascinating how well and easy it comes together, and how apparent it is once you see it. This represents the beginning of a new standard for CT, and a methodology that will be used going forward.
Note: These annotations we've come up with (l---, ll--, lll-, llll, l--l, l-l-, l-ll, ll-l) have come to mean far more than what I anticipated. This post will thus double as an introduction to the TeSi vultology but also as a more thorough explanation as to what these annotations mean not just for TeSi but for all the types.
TeSi
I realized watching vids has been a drag up til now, but do watch the videos here as they've been completely cleaned up for this occasion. Each is an unbroken 2-3 minutes of footage of only the subject (more details on this later). I also have side-by-sides at the end of some posts so you can see more clearly what the signature looks like. Each development level has a different vultology and you can check any new sample against this list of TeSi's to see what their development is.
Final Note: These visuals are matched together not only by eight development levels but also by attitude of the F function (seelie/unseelie), the presence or absence of flat affect, and by gender. When all these variables align in the same people (creating a 1 in 1024 match), the two individuals are essentially/automatically twin shades (which helps if they're also the same age/ethnicity). This new level of resolution will be the standard, which has a maximum number of 4096 when Ego/Subtype is factored in. However, ego is something that can't be measured vultologically but instead by examining psychology and what people say. To some extent this can be intuited from what they say in these short clips but it's better addressed through prolonged exposure and study of the person. (more info on this granular system can be found here) This thread will also be updated in the future as more gaps are filled in for all the possible developmental variants of the TeSi.
[/font][/b][/div]