Fe & Fi: Attitudes of the Heart

Nice job, Auburn ! I think this is a good baseline to work from, thank you for overcoming the difficulties involved, and pardon me for my nitpicking.

The only statement which throw me off was the following, in the introduction :
It seemed to me that the logical function was not unable to acknowledge this causation, but would not register it as significant, and even less so identify with it. Admittedly, the word "realize" is perhaps vague enough to allow for both interpretations.

Then, if you wish to improve the article some more, I think the focus could be on avoiding overlap with external factors, not in content, but again in wording.
Everything sounded typical and well crafted, but in rare occasions the description might have left room for ambiguity, from lookalike attitudes in the other pairing.

For example, it seemed to me that the "physical channel" of Fe could be confused with some physical challenges seen in Te users. A recent exemple would be the strange tango seen between Donald Trump and Emmanuel Macron (see link or link).
I am thinking of this sentence particularly : 
As there might be an understated difference between respecting a strong adversary, and an honorable one.

Similarly, it has been a usual experience for me to see Fi users very inclined to politeness, or more so "well-mannered". Indeed, most times, it was less flexible, and concurrent with a much more pressing feeling of "cowardice" or "bitchiness". They comply, sometimes to a preposterous degree, but it seems they do not own it as much as Fe adaptive. It stands as a matter of environment more than identity.

Still, among the wordings which could not be clear enough for an amateur audience, there might be « "voice of reason" of the heart ». It is welcome to get the reader from everyday notions to more technical ones, as in the rationality of the ethical function, but this particular transition seemed a little off. As a matter of fact, in French, we say basically the same thing by using the expression "intelligence of the heart" ("intelligence du coeur"), which also sounds paradoxical, but perhaps a little less so ?

Likewise, if we put aside the "shaming" title of the directive Fe paragraph, which sounds stress related, the word "reputation" does not account for some cases were the Fe user believe it is their duty to endure shame for a greater cause. What do you think of the word "ethos" (as in link) ? The latter is more about perceived "character" than "reputation", even though it is an oratory term which might be unknown to most people.

Beside, I cannot help but to notice that some examples felt very specific (pick-up artistry, church work), or personal (martyrdom). Make of that what you will.

Other than that, here is a couple misprints :
"If the greater good of a project requires that you work and extra 2 hours after work today and tomorrow" in Fe -Adaptation
"Directive Directive Fe will compel the person to ask those hard questions" in Fe - Leveling the truth

Again, I hope these remarks are useful and not too much disjointed. In any case, the article stands on its own. Congrats.

Aqua -thanks! ...also it's so good to hear that it resonate with a real Fi user.
that's very encouraging!

writing about functions i don't have is always a bit of a leap, where i hope i'm getting it right.. by viewing you guys from the outside and how you struggle. also, writing this made me realize just how similar-yet-so-foreign Fi is to me.