NiFe: The Definitive Vultology
Jun 26, 2018 21:57:43 GMT -5 by Auburn
sitbone, ash, and 4 more like this
Post by Auburn on Jun 26, 2018 21:57:43 GMT -5
Warning: Heads up! This thread is somewhat exhaustive/technical as it was primarily created for our vultology team in preparation for the upcoming practitioner program and requires a working understanding of the vultology code. But it's opened up here to the forum since I know there are some out there that wish to learn vultology more keenly as well. It may take a while to get through it (maybe read it in parts? ) as it essentially condenses a whole (upcoming) lecture into one thread. Also, videos load better in Chrome for me, not sure if that will help others. But here goes!
Background Context:
- Initial Thoughts on Development Levels
- TeSi Development Levels
- NeFi Development Levels
This is thread #3 of Development levels, focused on the NiFe type.
All existing NiFe samples have been revisited and grouped together based on even more subtle similarities in vultology. Quite to our satisfaction, and in the same pattern as the NeFi and TeSi threads, this also naturally separated NiFe's into even more similar psychologies. It appears to be an enduring truth that the more similar two people's vultologies are, the more similar their psychologies will inescapably be. This has greatly increased our understanding of NiFe's, and as stated before we're moving into a very granular quantification of types (1024+) based on the level of consciousness of each function; representing a new standard for CT, and a methodology that will be used going forward. I'm excited to share with you what's being uncovered.
Notes:
1) The annotations (l---, ll--, lll-, llll, l--l, l-l-, l-ll, ll-l) signify function consciousness, with "l" being fully conscious and "-" being subconscious or unconscious.
2) The attitude of the ethical function (adaptive/directive) is somewhat less relevant in P-lead types, and especially in P-heavy developments. So when the attitude appears unclear or irrelevant, "directive" is used as the default.
3) That said, it appears that almost all NiFe's have an irrelevant or directive attitude, or at least there is nothing to suggest explicit adaptive behavior.
NiFe
VALEIN
Background Context:
- Initial Thoughts on Development Levels
- TeSi Development Levels
- NeFi Development Levels
This is thread #3 of Development levels, focused on the NiFe type.
All existing NiFe samples have been revisited and grouped together based on even more subtle similarities in vultology. Quite to our satisfaction, and in the same pattern as the NeFi and TeSi threads, this also naturally separated NiFe's into even more similar psychologies. It appears to be an enduring truth that the more similar two people's vultologies are, the more similar their psychologies will inescapably be. This has greatly increased our understanding of NiFe's, and as stated before we're moving into a very granular quantification of types (1024+) based on the level of consciousness of each function; representing a new standard for CT, and a methodology that will be used going forward. I'm excited to share with you what's being uncovered.
Notes:
1) The annotations (l---, ll--, lll-, llll, l--l, l-l-, l-ll, ll-l) signify function consciousness, with "l" being fully conscious and "-" being subconscious or unconscious.
2) The attitude of the ethical function (adaptive/directive) is somewhat less relevant in P-lead types, and especially in P-heavy developments. So when the attitude appears unclear or irrelevant, "directive" is used as the default.
3) That said, it appears that almost all NiFe's have an irrelevant or directive attitude, or at least there is nothing to suggest explicit adaptive behavior.