Anne of Green Gables (Megan Follows)

For the idea the one you come up with an old post was awesome but was too complicated to remember and somewhat "mystic", and the risk is to being compared with people like pod'lair .
I think we need a similar acronym more symplier where is possible to come what types indicates through reasoning. I don't know, maybe something we can exhume the word "temperaments" with a different meaning, for us it will be the name for "quadras", for the specific names i think the must simple thing we can come up with is (taking alpha for example) "FeTiNeSi". Is really unpleasant and obvius but we don't the classic names of the types created by socionics and mbti, so it mantain also a coerence with it, we can justify us sayng that it was inspired by the Apple's minimalism .

About Megan: she makes me think a little of a friend (undecided between TeNi or NiTe), i think a shy TeNi can look like her when is younger

Interesting. I wonder if actors and actresses especially are able to use and move into their polar/subpolar functions while role-making.
In these recent interviews she really comes out as a TeNi.

I too see Fi over Te (dido to ayoungspirit). Even though her Te can come off strong at times, it seems to subside when she doesn't feel she needs to use it as much. I could be wrong, but it seems that those who have Fi over Te push their Te forward when they need to feel extroverted, but recedes back into Fi like cozying up into a comfy old chair, whereas Te leads aren't receding, but are casually advancing, since they are more aware of the outer world.

As for Megan Follows, aside from flashes of genuine in her original casting reel, the only thing I see is a woman being insincere (presenting a character that is supposed to be her 'image') for PR interviews. She doesn't want to be there. It's part of her job that annoys her.

You'll find this to be more and more the case as personalities age and mature.  The back end functions in shared cores/quadras level out, and end up being very similar.  The bulk of my best friends and romantic relationships have been people in my own core/quadra, with a few exceptions being in cores/quadras that share one of my pairs of functions.  From what I can discern, this is true of most people, regardless of what core/quadra they are a part of.

Also, might I suggest that if the 'Cores' idea is used that we number the Cores based on population instead?  It always bothered me that there was no apparent reason for the order Socionics chose.

This would amend my suggestion to the following...

FiNiSeTe = Core 1 = C1  (appx 33%)
FeNeSiTi = Core 2 = C2  (appx 31%)
FiNeSiTe = Core 3 = C3  (appx 22%)
FeNiSeTi = Core 4 = C4  (appx 14%)

It's all guesstimation and hunches from various sources, but they tend to line up  in the big picture about core/quadra.

www.theanconas.com/MBTI/mfstats.htm

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers-Briggs_Type_Indicator#Type_dynamics_and_development

www.mypersonality.info/personality-types/ (check each type for population percentages)

That's interesting, and I like the idea of Cores. However, we don't have any CT based estimations for the percentages of core types in population. Even MBTI numbers are mostly North American. Therefore, I would base the numbering on something else.