Post by teatime on Feb 1, 2018 15:59:25 GMT -5
simonemusic (Joseph), thank you! I saw this briefly before but didn't see the whole thing. You really have beautiful eyes. You also remind me a lot of my daughter. She's three, but I can see Fi, Ni and Se in her. No Te yet for her though.
You know, it's hard for me to say if puns are an outgrowth of Ne or Si. My son is a Si-lead, and his puns are... Not yet well developed, but they are constant. It's the phonology of a thing is more real to him, whereas my Ne tends to glaze over the phonology and go straight to semantics. I saw this awesome description the other day, and it really helped my understanding of the functions. You likely are already familiar with information elements (https://www.liquisearch.com/socionics/information_elements). I have always been very, very aware that my Ne does not see the surface of objects well. Si, being a field function, would make the association between phonology. Se, being an object-oriented function, would not. I'm not explaining this well.
You know, it's hard for me to say if puns are an outgrowth of Ne or Si. My son is a Si-lead, and his puns are... Not yet well developed, but they are constant. It's the phonology of a thing is more real to him, whereas my Ne tends to glaze over the phonology and go straight to semantics. I saw this awesome description the other day, and it really helped my understanding of the functions. You likely are already familiar with information elements (https://www.liquisearch.com/socionics/information_elements). I have always been very, very aware that my Ne does not see the surface of objects well. Si, being a field function, would make the association between phonology. Se, being an object-oriented function, would not. I'm not explaining this well.
