chaoticbrain well i never found those pictures, finally someone where he smiles. About the Jung observations... i think he was thinking about SiTe like mbti.
chaoticbrain well i never found those pictures, finally someone where he smiles. About the Jung observations... i think he was thinking about SiTe like mbti.
Well I read this article. Apparently he thought freud was a sensation type and extraverted in his early days.
chaoticbrain That's really interesting. So Jung firstly considered he could possibly be an Sx lead with secondary feeling function, indirectly he said that for him he was an SeFi. I don't know how in this article they could think in the latter times that Freud was an FiNe.
Jung: β[Freud was] an introverted feeling type with inferior thinking. β¦ Freud, then as later, presented the picture of extraverted thinker and empiricist.β [February 18, 1957]
I think this is the interpretation of a mtbi typologist and his prejudices against Sx-Fx types. I see he was giving also the possibility for FiSe, not only for FiNe.
"We have Jung in our part, MBTI! How you want to justify your mistypings?"
Post by chaoticbrain on Aug 3, 2013 6:30:02 GMT -5
Heron
Yes I was also wondering where he said anything about him being FiNe. It seems interesting to me that someone would have such knowledge of Jung to be aware of obscure quotes, but not have an accurate understanding of "intuition" and "sensing" at all.
The whole website is filled with most wild misconceptions, I mean they type Charles Darwin as "INTP" yet also type Nietzsche as a Te user. whaaaaaa ?
Last Edit: Aug 3, 2013 6:31:11 GMT -5 by chaoticbrain