Post by Dreamer on Oct 2, 2013 7:21:04 GMT -5
Oct 2, 2013 6:36:27 GMT -5 @morsecode said:
johndoe Well, after your photos I'm even mooooaaaar inclined to see you as being a TiSe who has got great development of lower processes.Still not certain though, right? It seems you folks need more to go on, so I'll upload another video and add it to my original post.
It essentially comes down to this. I believe that one who is ill-informed or uninformed of a subject does NOT have a belief or disbelief in this subject. They don't know it exists therefore, their belief hasn't formed yet. I.E. I think it's silly to say a 2 year old is an atheist because they're unaware of the concept of God. That 2 year old may become the most die hard evangelistic the world has ever seen. I see beliefs as something more fluid, not clear cut. It's not black/white nor is it a Boolean. Most people cannot even say where they fall within a spectrum of beliefs, many fall somewhere in the gray with their beliefs changing constantly. Essentially, what I'm saying is that what is incorrectly termed agnostics, people who believe agnosticism refers to 'being on the fence' still exists; despite agnosticism not having that definition. If one were to say that Pluto were no longer a planet does that make Pluto no longer exist? Of course not; Pluto still exists, however, the category it fits in will have to change. Just as the popular interpretation of agnosticism will have to be referred to in a different way than the incorrectly associated term agnosticism
Tl;dr : Even though agnosticism doesn't mean what most people think it means, that doesn't mean that the incorrectly associated meaning does not exist.
If this exchange of ideas is becoming tedious though, I understand if you wish to cut it off ... it's no worries.
I think we'll agree to disagree - sorry! If I argued any further I'd just be repeating myself at this point. My apologies - I'm just not too great at debating this kind of thing. More into stuff like ethics and ideology, and even then only in an informal sense. Was a good exchange though, so thank you.
Oct 2, 2013 6:49:33 GMT -5 @morsecode said:
Parenthesis: I find it amazing how many babies exhibit their functions in their little faces. Per example, I can't help seeing this 1 month and a half baby as a beta, probably TiSe. 
mind his Ni eyebrows and Ni forehead micro-contraction (mine contracts the exact same way)... the Ti neutralization in his little face, cheeks. PS: I enjoy the contrast between his total seriousness in this shot and the playful silly bunny ears at the back. Cute kid! :3
