Post by Auburn on Mar 28, 2013 16:48:24 GMT -5
WARNING:
Due to the fact that these 'Larin Video Series Clear Examples' threads were created as places for us to post clear examples of types and not wrong typings hehe ^^, and also due to the fact that these threads were becoming a big big mess (see conversation about it: cognitivetype.boards.net/thread/793/) in that thread we came to the conclusion that it's better that members post a celebrity or youtuber-celeb [create a thread with his/her name] in the board 'Reading Practice & Celebrity Typing' and only after a consensus involving discussion of signals should we post videos here.
So, if you think someone is a clear example of a CT, instead of posting the person here, open a thread with the person's name (in case the person is not there yet) here: cognitivetype.boards.net/board/7/readers
Thanks
@morsecode 3/9/2014
________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
Due to the fact that these 'Larin Video Series Clear Examples' threads were created as places for us to post clear examples of types and not wrong typings hehe ^^, and also due to the fact that these threads were becoming a big big mess (see conversation about it: cognitivetype.boards.net/thread/793/) in that thread we came to the conclusion that it's better that members post a celebrity or youtuber-celeb [create a thread with his/her name] in the board 'Reading Practice & Celebrity Typing' and only after a consensus involving discussion of signals should we post videos here.
So, if you think someone is a clear example of a CT, instead of posting the person here, open a thread with the person's name (in case the person is not there yet) here: cognitivetype.boards.net/board/7/readers
Thanks
@morsecode 3/9/2014
________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________
Imo most signs can't be manipulated, at least not for more than some seconds (unless nothing is happening in someon's head than the desire to control every tiny movement being made), especially during interviews when people are asked questions that are often somewhat unpredictable, like in talk shows, where the next question (or remark) usually comes from P-leads delta hosts that come up with them as a 'reaction' to what had been said before (using lots of Te and Ne (in a disarming way)). I personally don't think that all celebrities are lead by marketing to the point of truly being able to (or willing to) control their signals when they're not working (acting, reheasals). Nevertheless, there is an exception imo: I've noticed that enneagram type 3s tend to be some of the hardest celebrities to type via vr, because it's part of their ego defenses and strategies to adapt to whatever they sense is expected ftom them at a certain moment. This can cause them to behave extremely differently from interview to interview, to such a high degree that can really affect their ct signals (because they are truly acting) make readers confused. Whenever I suspect a celebrity might be a 3, I try to watch as many interviews as possible to avoid being tricked by them. Good examples of case like this is type 3 Andrew Lloyd Webber and type 3 Fernanda Montenegro, type 3 Ricky Martin, tye 3 Mark Hamill, among many others.. cases like this abound, because type 3s are not rarely drawn to the acting arts. These are the people that are willing to be truly led by what is expected from them ("media and marketing gurus, public relations workers, agents and so on and all of these people help them to create their image and manipulate with their natural expressions"). E3 is the type least hesitant to build and maintain sham marriages, hide their sexual orientation when they believe it can bring hazards to their career, etc. they're very identified with how they are perceived and tend to have identity issues. There are people like that in any professional field, and not ALL celebrities are like that, not even the great majority. Just my thoughts - based on what I've been observing.