The Consensus Thread / Member Reads

So the idea is to develop a community on this forum of exceptional readers who can agree in their methods of reading, independently. To refine our capacity to understand all variety of people, and possibly create something amazing out of it.

I know Alerith and I are the founding admins, but our reads only count as much as any other member, and our aim is to present our logic (which can definitely be debated and perhaps corrected) to our reading methods and see if others find them reasonable. Should a consensus develop around that methodology, or another, it would be because others can see things in the same light. This is also an experiment we're conducting, to see if others can find the consistency in it, or helps us improve what we have started. This is potentially just the beginning.

So a consensus would involve two or more members agreeing on a read. If two or more groups of members have different consensus, the largest group is considered the consensus. We'll be updating this listing continually, as many more reads are made.


edit: You guys are free to change your stance on a read, just let me know by posting in this thread.

Oh, my apologies *removed* (: