teatime i posted that gif of her back in 2014 when i believed her to be FiSe. I still see the smile in that gif as ambiguous in isolation, but agree with the more recent typing of her as TiSe. I should probably delete that example, or Auburn, do you think it's best to all together scrap a lot of these old communally made threads of specific signals that might now be misleading?
Auburn , I see Scarlett Johanssen on here as Fi-lead. You have her typed in the system as TiSe, and this was after her type had been ambiguous for a while.
(There are a few other non Fi people here too. Of course, we all use the same signals, it's the larger patterns that matter)
i can only speak for myself. this thread was neither made nor endorsed by me ;p a lot of stuff from years back is filled with inaccuracies, so i wouldn't recommend using them as references. these were created by members testing the waters and trying to get a handle of things.