What do you think about my type?

I can see FiSe, but TeNi seems more likely from this video. You make a lot of strong pushes, forceful gesticulations, and have outwardly directed energy. I have a harder time seeing you as a Ji-lead, at least from this video.

EDIT: On more viewing, I definitely see you as FiSe. The way Te manifests in your signals suggests Fi over Te. There is an awkwardness behind your gesticulations and pushes, almost as if you're trying to force it. You also lack the so-called "Te confidence". This suggests that your articulation (Te) is subordinate to your compass (Fi).

How reliable an indicator is the soft, breathy Fi voice? I didn't see any of that come from her.  Quite the opposite actually.

roberts To show you how Te-like an Fi-lead can appear, I suggest you to watch videos of FiNe Jean Dujardin. I was less experienced and seriously thought he was TeSi...
However in her case, I don't see any ambiguity, just a good use of Te. Then, maybe at that time, I would have taken her for a TeNi too hehe.

sophiadeep mh... you know, in all the mbti tests I did I resulted INTJ, all the time. In some test purely Jungian (so the "raw" theory) i resulted something like: Fi>Ni>Ne-Ti>Se>Te>Si>Fe, with INFP, INFJ and INTJ as possible types. Only socionics got it almost right, saying INTj-LII.
The reason is that these are personality theories, and so they are easily subject of stereotyping, like saying that a person is Ne lead because; "he always say jokes", "uses to say random things", "is extremely optimistic", "is innovative", "looks at the future" etc etc. Mbti in particular is extremely USELESS when the practitioners type through the letters in the Keirsey way:

"oooh i like to stay with people so i'm E, i am really intelligent so i'm N! But i have an heart, i'm not one of those insensitive intellectuals that care only about themselves and not about people, so i'm F, and i'm a very ordered person, also extremely judicious about things so i'm J. Is so blatantly obvious: i'm ENFJ!".


I would almost save Socionics because sometimes it is more accurate, even if is subject to stereotyping anyway. Is not rare that CT matches very often with Socionics and almost never with MBTI.
While the jungian theory itself is just incomplete, and more than once through this people type mostly themselves without external opinions, and lots of people get mistyped because of that. But this is the source material: respect bro!

I don't have time now (doing homeworkz) to explain things accurately, but there is a post made by Erifrail that explain things with great accuracy!
Here it is (click MEH)
I just want to precise two things: If you want to rely on a personality theory, use the enneagram wich is much more intelligent and accurate than mbti, and even if Erifrail seems to not agree about that, it matches pretty well with CT. Somehow it makes even more sense.