Type my boyfriend, pretty pleeeaseee :D

Jon is a NeFi. (Pinterest: NeFi)

Lots of very clear Fi/Te and Si/Ne signals. The Pe-energy is very clear and he obviously have the flexible Pe mindset going. It's not an accident that he went off script in your own video and started asking you the questions that he found interesting. He also has the typical male NeFi “look” (the most common physical appearance for male NeFi types). So everything fits with NeFi.

jlee143, your boyfriend is one the easiest persons to type I have ever seen. I see your boyfriend as being NeFi. His momentum is very Pe-lead. He has all the Fi/Te, Si/Ne signals at a very harcore visible level. His first oscillation wheel is Ne/Si. His Te is heavy, but not the leading function.

When I started doing Visual Reading I sometimes got so hopeless when I saw I was often misinterpreting signals (not that I am unfailable nowadays, but time really makes most people misinterpret signals much much less often than when beginners). And it took a lot of patience and consolation from both Erifrail and Alerith to make me see what they truly meant with the signals and not misinterpret them, like seeing zoning-outs in Ne users for instance and other wild mistakes (again, it doesn't mean I don't do mistakes at all nowadays).  Their explanations made me see where and how I was misterpreting some cues because when we see different cues in the same time stamps, it doesn't mean the theory is garbage (even if still fragile and imperfect. I have my critics to the system just like everyone but I must be fair about what is spot on in CT) but that maybe our understanding of the signals actually migh be (as it happened to me, and I believe that happened to just everyone here).


First off,


In CT we don't use 'fluidity of body' to detect Pe-lead - that sounds even more Pi than Pe. Pe-lead is not exactly about fuidity. That word can be misleading of what Pe-lead is about as it doesn't represent Pe and it not part of CT lexicon to refer to Pe in a precise way, and using that word can take to misinterpretations. It might seem subtle but it is essential to avoid disastrous confusions. What Pe-lead have is called 'momentum' and jlee143 's boyfriend is an excellent example of what Pe-lead momentum is about / fluid body SWAYING. Words can't explain this signal as well as living examples. So, check out this thread to get a better grasp of this Pe-lead signal: cognitivetype.boards.net/thread/734/lead-loose-fluid-body-swaying

Second,


not to mistake Te signals with Je-lead signals, or you are going to inevitably think that every Te-heavy user is a Je lead (and as I mentioned previously, the person being typed is a heavy user of Te, which isn't an indicative at all of his 'hierarchy of functions) in CT. In your words "exacting, angular movements"... well, that is not indicative of Je-lead, but of Je usage I don't know where you took that idea from. Very crucial: in CT, we don't detect the leading function based exactly on how high / how frequent a signal is present but on other cues. This misconception  can lead to very incorrect readings, I have observed. Nothing to worry, and this is why I am taking the time to clarify these things to you.

Third, 

The eyes leading the body (eye centricity) is possibly the most unreliable signal ever to detect P lead versus J lead. And even Erifrail eventually seemed to stop relying on that cue in his readings.

I hope that was enough to clarify things. Jon is clearly let by extraverted perception, a very example of Pe-lead and I am sure no experienced visual reader would question that.

I am not going to provide you time stamps because in the new threads of yesterday linked here below I could see it would be useless, as you gave time stamps to support your NiFe typing for (NeFi - alt. FiNe) Janet Devlin that does not even correspond to how I perceive her functions, so that proved me to be unfrutiferous  because the threads below (and many other threads) make certainly  clear that we have not been speaking at all the same VR language for most of the time.
About your experience in visual reading, I can tell you only the same I would tell any person that has been doing VR (myself inclused): keep practing.

If I 'mistook' you as a beginner it is probably because I don't remember you practing visual reading from long ago and also for some other reasons. About pms to share about Erifrail's terminology, no, thanks, I appreciate. If you want, you can share everything you have memorized at any thread you'd prefer. 

The dynamics of the forum used be much healthier long ago before I gave a break from the forum. The people who post here changed for the most part, and the dynamics of the forum is certainly a reflection of the most active members psyches' as a whole. When I came back here it was already in this very ill state. I miss how it used to be. You know, a long time before you  started  contributing to our Visual Readings and posts in general so I dunno you can remember.

cognitivetype.boards.net/thread/1049/janet-devlin

cognitivetype.boards.net/thread/1020/worst-type-me-video-history?page=2&scrollTo=12132