Vlog type me

mona
New Member

Posts: 5

Vlog type me Sept 20, 2014 16:25:25 GMT -5 by mona

Quote

Post by mona on Sept 20, 2014 16:25:25 GMT -5

Hey, I am new to this site and since I've been interested in Jungian functions for quite a while now, I thought why not try this out. I'll be honest and say, that I am about 90% sure about my function type, but it would be really interesting to know your thoughts. I started a video blog unrelated to Jung, or MBTI, but it could be a good example for typing.

Zweilous
Full Member

Posts: 282

Type: TiNe-Ne
Development: llll
Temperament: ENT

Vlog type me Sept 20, 2014 20:47:15 GMT -5 by Zweilous

Quote

Post by Zweilous on Sept 20, 2014 20:47:15 GMT -5

One of the PeFi, I think. You have Fi tension/smiles and a little Fi sass, and Pe-lead energy. I'm more familiar with SeFi that use your particular gestures, but you do also blink and toggle a lot, so I don't think NeFi is impossible. I'm inclined toward SeFi if I had to pick, though.

mona
New Member

Posts: 5

Vlog type me Sept 21, 2014 4:58:51 GMT -5 by mona

Quote

Post by mona on Sept 21, 2014 4:58:51 GMT -5

Sept 20, 2014 20:47:15 GMT -5 Zweilous said:

One of the PeFi, I think. You have Fi tension/smiles and a little Fi sass, and Pe-lead energy. I'm more familiar with SeFi that use your particular gestures, but you do also blink and toggle a lot, so I don't think NeFi is impossible. I'm inclined toward SeFi if I had to pick, though.

thanks man.

roberts Full Member Posts: 266 Type: NeTi	Vlog type me Sept 21, 2014 17:12:36 GMT -5 by roberts Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by roberts on Sept 21, 2014 17:12:36 GMT -5 I'm leaning more toward NeFi than SeFi but definitely Pe-lead. I think we could type you more confidently if you create a video for this purpose.
	"It is the theory that decides what we can observe" -Einstein

mona
New Member

Posts: 5

Vlog type me Sept 21, 2014 17:57:48 GMT -5 by mona

Quote

Post by mona on Sept 21, 2014 17:57:48 GMT -5

Sept 21, 2014 17:12:36 GMT -5 roberts said:

I'm leaning more toward NeFi than SeFi but definitely Pe-lead. I think we could type you more confidently if you create a video for this purpose.

Thanks. What should the video be about? Any particular questions, or topic I should choose?

At-Ease Zazeef Full Member Posts: 192 Type: NeFi	Vlog type me Sept 21, 2014 20:47:46 GMT -5 by At-Ease Zazeef Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by At-Ease Zazeef on Sept 21, 2014 20:47:46 GMT -5 mona Check out the second post on this thread. GLHF!

mona New Member Posts: 5	Vlog type me Sept 23, 2014 6:09:15 GMT -5 by mona Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by mona on Sept 23, 2014 6:09:15 GMT -5 Thanks @at-Ease Zazeef, I did check the thread although I decided to answer a questionnaire I found on perc, I hope it's ok. I am a bit sleepy in a video, I recorded it pretty early.

roberts Full Member Posts: 266 Type: NeTi	Vlog type me Sept 23, 2014 17:00:16 GMT -5 by roberts Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by roberts on Sept 23, 2014 17:00:16 GMT -5 Soft, feathering, Ne eye toggles. Fi smile, unsyncopated Fi gesticulations, Fi disengaged eyes down. Pe-Lead loose body swaying and excited energy. NeFi
	"It is the theory that decides what we can observe" -Einstein

At-Ease Zazeef
Full Member

Posts: 192

Type: NeFi

Vlog type me Sept 23, 2014 17:18:35 GMT -5 by At-Ease Zazeef

Quote

Post by At-Ease Zazeef on Sept 23, 2014 17:18:35 GMT -5

Either NeFi or SeFi, leeeeaning toward SeFi.

Eye-centric, loose swaying posture, and catchin'-a-wave buoyancy point to Pe-lead. I'm confident of that if nothing else. Fi snarly smile, Fi tension presents at times (though with less frequency than would leave me super confident that that is in fact what I'm seeing. I don't know, the cues often present themselves differently in different folks, are so dependent on individual facial features! Gah!). Initially thought Ne, but the more I watch, the more I am reminded of Se-confirmed folk.

Last Edit: Sept 23, 2014 17:19:33 GMT -5 by At-Ease Zazeef

roberts
Full Member

Posts: 266

Type: NeTi

Vlog type me Sept 23, 2014 17:44:20 GMT -5 by roberts

Quote

Post by roberts on Sept 23, 2014 17:44:20 GMT -5

For me Ne eyes seem a lot softer than Se's. Less shiny and stare-y. Also, even tho Ne and Se both toggle a lot, Ne's seem to stop at more points of focus in their visual field than Se's, which stop less frequently but lock on when they do stop, giving a sense of presence, like they might actually be conscious of the things they are locked on to. As opposed to an Ne user like myself who is rarely conscious of the visual field when toggling.

Last Edit: Sept 23, 2014 17:44:58 GMT -5 by roberts

"It is the theory that decides what we can observe" -Einstein

At-Ease Zazeef
Full Member

Posts: 192

Type: NeFi

Vlog type me Sept 23, 2014 18:02:12 GMT -5 by At-Ease Zazeef peppergirl and roberts like this

Quote

Post by At-Ease Zazeef on Sept 23, 2014 18:02:12 GMT -5

I get that, definitely. For me, overall, it's getting from individual cues ("Okay, that looked like a zone out", or "Oh, that was Fi tension... right?") to the general vibe ("okay, there's definitely Ni going on in there" and "I can definitely liken him to other folks confirmed as being that type"). It's sort of tough for me to absorb enough of the cues to confidently *jump!* into the realm of the other. It's the difference between objective, ticking-a-box-on-a-score-sheet sort of observation and subjective "okay, this is what I think/feel/have-welling-up-from-within-me conclusion of what is going on inside of them." Another way to put it, to really belabor the matter, is to call the cues the symptoms, the actual read of this type or that type as the underlying condition.

I can definitely see things that seem to me like Ne cues in mona, but I don't get the overall Ne Naive vibe. Can't make the jump to that.

Last Edit: Sept 23, 2014 18:04:14 GMT -5 by At-Ease Zazeef

peppergirl
Senior Member

Posts: 878

Type: NiTe

Vlog type me Sept 23, 2014 19:06:42 GMT -5 by peppergirl

Quote

Post by peppergirl on Sept 23, 2014 19:06:42 GMT -5

Hi mona welcome

You're very Pe-heavy and definitely Fi-user, I think everyone sees that lol. However, I agree that your p functions are not obvious to me. I initially thought NeFi but the more I watch your vid, the more you look SeFi actually. The quality of the video doesn't help so it's hard, plus the fact you rarely scowl (whether in a Si or Ni way) which adds difficulty. I noticed that SeFis and NeFis (and probably PeTis too) can look each other a lot if they don't show much Pi scowlings, (think SeFi Shirley Temple whose eyes kinda look naive at first). However, you seem to do the lock-on stare several times, your eyes look quite "present" when you stare at us, I don't see any naivete in them. Plus, you seem to have the upper eye-lids resting over your eyes sometimes (though I don't think this one is always a consistant signal).

On a very subjective note, you give off a Gamma vibe, more raw/real than naive and scattered but this one is totally personal feeling

I may be wrong.

So I'd say you're SeFi for now.

roberts
Full Member

Posts: 266

Type: NeTi

Vlog type me Sept 23, 2014 22:12:21 GMT -5 by roberts

Quote

Post by roberts on Sept 23, 2014 22:12:21 GMT -5

mona, if you're having fun exploring this and dont mind making yet another video, I bet several of us would enjoy seeing a video of better quality, perhaps at eye level, with good lighting, and a little closer so we can see your eyes working. As peppergirl mentioned, the quality is a little fuzzy and can make identifying nuanced cognitive functions like Ne and Se tough.

"It is the theory that decides what we can observe" -Einstein

mona New Member Posts: 5	Vlog type me Sept 24, 2014 9:40:28 GMT -5 by mona At-Ease Zazeef likes this Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top Post by mona on Sept 24, 2014 9:40:28 GMT -5 LOL 28 mins , I hope this one will be good enough

Zweilous
Full Member

Posts: 282

Type: TiNe-Ne
Development: llll
Temperament: ENT

Vlog type me Sept 24, 2014 12:08:23 GMT -5 by Zweilous via mobile peppergirl and At-Ease Zazeef like this

Quote

Post by Zweilous on Sept 24, 2014 12:08:23 GMT -5

Yeah, I'm pretty set on a high-toggling SeFi. Se toggles can be just as common as Ne ones, but I've found they tend to hit the main target more in the course of their toggling.

(Target, left, target, right-left-target, disengage down, target).

This in contrast to Ne which tends to be pretty evenly distributed, only hitting the target accdentally or when the user consciously returns as a way of communicating politeness.

(Left, other left, center left, center but not on target, target, up, disengage down, down right, down left, down right, center right, target)

You do toggle a lot for an Se user, but I agree with (most) others that the quality and pattern seems Se to me. I totally get that "present" feel and the slight Ni-lids. You remind me a lot of my sister, and a girl I used to work with (who had your accent, too! Uncanny!)

Heads Up!

Post by mona on Sept 20, 2014 16:25:25 GMT -5

Post by Zweilous on Sept 20, 2014 20:47:15 GMT -5

Post by mona on Sept 21, 2014 4:58:51 GMT -5

Post by roberts on Sept 21, 2014 17:12:36 GMT -5

Post by mona on Sept 21, 2014 17:57:48 GMT -5

Post by At-Ease Zazeef on Sept 21, 2014 20:47:46 GMT -5

Post by mona on Sept 23, 2014 6:09:15 GMT -5

Post by roberts on Sept 23, 2014 17:00:16 GMT -5

Post by At-Ease Zazeef on Sept 23, 2014 17:18:35 GMT -5

Post by roberts on Sept 23, 2014 17:44:20 GMT -5

Post by At-Ease Zazeef on Sept 23, 2014 18:02:12 GMT -5

Post by peppergirl on Sept 23, 2014 19:06:42 GMT -5

Post by roberts on Sept 23, 2014 22:12:21 GMT -5

Post by mona on Sept 24, 2014 9:40:28 GMT -5

Post by Zweilous on Sept 24, 2014 12:08:23 GMT -5

Discord Chat