50/50 J/P on MBTI tests, which one is it?

Hi, and welcome to the forum!

I am not the best visual reader around here, I'm still honing my skills. Anyway, my take is that you use Ti and Fe for judging (warm swell in voice, quick neutralization of smiles, flat cheeks, etc). I am not so sure about your perception functions, but I think you have Ni and Se. You have a rigid posture, so I'm going with TiSe (alt. TiNe), for the moment.

This is pretty much exactly what I have to say. All I have to add is face-centric (corroborating the J-lead read).

Edit: Would like to say I'm not super confident in this read. More footage, as you, Calin, have already suggested, would certainly be welcome!

I might be an Se user, but Se being my 2nd function? I doubt it. I do enjoy taking risks and getting involved in thrill-seeking situations, but my attention to physical details and spatial orientation are quite precarious. I'm also way more future-oriented than present-oriented.

Welcome to the boards, Calin!

Just to let you know, CT reeeaally doesn't throw any support behind MBTI reads or the corresponding type profiles. Rather than sort individuals out between 16 generalized descriptions by method of best fit, CT tries to ascertain the underlying cognitive function preferences through unconsciously-generated motile cues. These cues are something like tells in the game of poker - "Oh, he held his breath when he saw his last card - he must have completed his flush" or "They're acting more casual this hand - he does that every time he's bluffing" - it doesn't matter how good you are at poker, some unconscious stuff always finds its way out. And so it is with the cognitive functions and cues - the functions are going on in there, and they express themselves through the eyes, hands, gestures, posture, movements in what we call cues.

As such, VR at CT isn't concerned with how the types behave, but rather that we accurately assess the individual's underlying type through more objective, closer-to-falsifiable methods than simply looking at broad behavioral data/preferences; those questionnaires out there are completely muddled by subjectivity. The idea is to first figure out someone's type and only then start making links between the similarities resulting from type (which the theory hasn't begun to approach yet).

MBTI is basically just a bundle of misconceptions propped up by the Forer effect. Because of its popularity, CT sort of has it's work cut out for it in regards to unteaching what people think they know about the Jungian personality types and cognitive functions. In fact, I've heard a number of experienced forumers reflect on how much less of an impact cognitive functions have on determining personality than MBTI and/or Socionics had led them to believe. Which isn't to say that cognitive function preference isn't important, just not as much or not in the ways that popular thought has hitherto believed.

Bah. This post is a mess. I'm terrible at the "This is what we do at CT/This is not MBTI" spiel. Anybody else, please, take a crack at it. I know I've left out simple, key stuff here. :( :(

Oh! And please do make a video where you are speaking your native tongue! The ideal "type me" video is one in which the typee is talking to a living, breathing human being (makes you actually behave "in the moment" in front of us, and not in some unnatural, overly self-aware or canned sort of way). Also, put some thought into lighting (we need to be able to make out your eyes fairly well) and the framing of the shot (try to get the upper half of your body into the frame so we easily see hand gesture and postural cues). THAT WOULD BE AWESOMMME.

It's also important to know that the oscillation between Ti + Se works differently than Se + Ni. So, the Se + Ni oscillation might not be something you can relate to very well but maybe it's different with Ti + Se? I can't tell you the difference but I know there is one. And as faeruss said, you might be Ni heavy.
And At-Ease Zazeef put it pretty well. MBTI describes behavior which can change throughout your life depending on how what's going on on the inside, but CT describes the nature of who you are. There are different shades/archetypes of each type so not every TiSe will look the same. I, for instance, have a TiSe brother and he isn't very Se heavy but has more Ti (and maybe Ni), so he comes across as more reserved than a TiSe who has more Se and/or Fe.
If you haven't already, I suggest you take a look at this.

Calin, Eye-centricity for J-function lead.

Te relaxed / sober face. Te monotonous speech pattern. You drop your hands heavily onto your desk after gesticulating which is common among Je-leads, and among them almost always Te's. 

Ni Slow, sleepy blinks. Ni heavy upper eye lid.  Se eye toggles.

I didn't get much indication either way from your brief smiles for Fe or Fi.

My best guess is TeNi.

EDIT: I think your smile at 1:53 is Fi.

I'm also in favour of the additional video motion if you're feeling up to it. Native tongue, better lighting, more torso in the frame if possible.